|
||||||||
| Xoutpost server transfer and maintenance is occurring.... |
| Xoutpost is currently undergoing a planned server migration.... stay tuned for new developments.... sincerely, the management |
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#341
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Closed the hood, gave me my paperwork and I was on my way. |
| Sponsored Links | |
|
|
|
|
#342
|
|||
|
|||
|
Update re smog test...
So E46 2003 325i with 100K with this CCV mod in San Jose CA. I installed the beauty cover on top of the fuel rail. - First shop is somewhat familiar with BMW. Checked error codes: none. Opened the hood: saw the CCV Mod, decided to fail me and said it cost some $700 to install the stock CCV...Guys were smoking something, I said no thanks...lol - Second shop (mostly Japanese cars). Checked error codes: none. Used another fancier computer (another level above the basic OBD-II readers): no codes. Never checked the tailpipe emission. He said tailpipe testing for pollutants such as NOx and CO etc. is for cars before OBD-II, such as cars before 1996 or so. Opened the hood: did a quick visual check. Passed with flying colors, zero codes. The Smog station has a special computer that sends data directly to California DMV computers.
__________________
1998 E39 528i 5sp MT 2006 E53 X5 3.0 6sp MT |
|
#343
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
|
|
#344
|
|||
|
|||
|
Just did my 04 3.0 after a hydro lock(at idle -25c)
Had to remove plugs to suck oil out ,fortunately no damage.After two weeks Noticed drastic decrease in oil consumption . Surprised since I had previously run an 02 for two winters with same mod(done byP.o)as it was consuming quite a bit of oil.My E46s seem less subject to CCV freeze ups,all have cold weather kits As Did the x5.Maybe tighter engine compartment has slower cool of for more Drain time? Anyhow I am pleased one less winter issue.
__________________
René Active 2002 325IT black mt 2003 330 sport silver mt 2004 325IT greymet mt 2002 x5 silver 3.0 auto 2004 x5 black 3.0 auto 2006 Grand caravan previous many many volvo 240 wagons 1978-93 |
|
#345
|
||||
|
||||
|
Hi all,
Just returned from a smog check. Tech plugged in OBDII and test took 5 mins, no underhood check or anything. Passed no prob. Been 3 or 4 years with mod, getting smogs…..never failed. I live in LV, NV.
__________________
'04 E53 3.0i 189K+ miles |
|
#346
|
|||
|
|||
|
I need to do this before next winter. I installed the catch can and it's constantly getting filled. Maybe it was just in the winter.
I'd drive like 500km and it'd be full. Yesterday I drove about 500km in super warm weather, and the catch can is almost empty. |
|
#347
|
|||
|
|||
|
I've also been in the waiting list for the GAS system but nothing is happening on there.
|
|
#348
|
|||
|
|||
|
Did anyone measure the vacuum with this mod?
Does torque app measure it properly? ![]() ![]() I don’t think torque measure it properly. I held my hand to the port for about 2-3 minutes, and it started hurting me lol. It pulled enough that you can really feel the suction after a few minutes. When I removed my hand, the vacuum stayed the same on the torque app, so obviously it's not right or it's meant to show something else. My concern is that this much vacuum will damage the seals. I'm not that afraid about the VCG. If VCG got damaged from this mod, I can cancel the mod and replace the gasket. It's the rear main seal I'm concerned about and don't want it to start leaking. So I'm wondering if anyone had any seals/gasket damage with this mod and if anyone actually measure the vacuum? |
|
#349
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
I have had reduced oil usage with this mod, but I also put a catch can in the system and it does catch oil, so it is not a panacea for oil usage, if the can wasn't there it would be getting sucked into the intake and getting burned off. |
|
#350
|
|||
|
|||
|
Thanks for sharing, you're probably one of the most senior guys with this mod.
I wish someone had measured the actual pressure. Could I ask you to put your hand over the oil cap and say how strong is the suction? I'd love to leave this mod now that I've done it. I really don't want to pull the manifold to reinstall another CCV assembly. I wish I had just installed a brand new CCV when I pulled the manifold last time. I was fooled by people running catch cans and cursing the ccv system, so I naively believed that it was evil and wanted to get rid of it. The issue with the suction is that I'm afraid it will pull on the oil seal too hard and bust it. I have already ordered ac delco top engine cleaner, so that will clean and unstick the rings. Now it's interesting that I've rear quite a lot of threads on this mod, maybe all of them, and lots of people said that it stopped oil consumption, so I do trust that. It's also interesting that no one complained of the damaged seals. So either people it happened to were to embarrassed to post about it or maybe, truly, miraculously, no one ever had an issue. I'm thinking of buying a vacuum gauge and testing the pressure, maybe I can find someone who has measured it for comparison. I wonder what's the safe limit. On another note, I heard some people saying that with this mod, you get too much pressure, and your gaskets gets blown out. Kinda interesting, how do you get excessive pressure when you're having vacuum. Maybe something I don't get. Now my opinion on catch cans, not directed towards you, they're complete junk. First of all, it's too simple of a system to separate oil and vapors. Like, while the blow by gases pass through the can, probably a very small portion will stay in there. It's only by gravity that some oil droplets will actually stay in the can, everything else will continue traveling into the manifold. So I think the catch can is just useless. Actually I think it's worse than that. Especially in the winter, because of condensation the stupid thing gets filled up with mostly water all the time. That's why I think the oil catch can is the biggest gimmick... |
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Tags |
| ccv, oil separator, pcv, vacuum, ventilation |
|
|
|
|