Even though this is his thread, since he started it?

Even though there have been 60 replies?

Even though there are currently 879 views?

Why? Seems like a healthy discussion, to me Is the problem that it doesn't match your own political agenda?

__________________
2007 X3 3.0si, 6 MT, Premium, White

Retired:
2008 535i, 6 MT, M Sport, Premium, Space Grey
2003 X5 3.0 Steptronic, Premium, Titanium Silver
2002 325xi 5 MT, Steel Grey
2004 Z4 3.0 Premium, Sport, SMG, Maldives Blue

No, mostly because Eric has never met an anti-Republican conspiracy theory he doesn't like.

__________________
2010 528Xi
I demand justice.
Or, if there must be injustice, let it be in my favor.

Reynold's Wrap: it's not just for hats anymore.

You know, there could be another solution to the 'evidence' presented.

My wife and I were having a discussion prompted by some press articles and some of the comments I have read in this thread (aside from the vitriol).

My question is how come WTC 7 came down like it was properly demolished due to 'debris' when other buildings didn't. I ask this as we watched a Nat Geo article recently on the Oklahoma? bombing and how the truck damaged the entire face of the building, yet it remained standing. To my mind, the structural method (ie steel skins) of construction is given as the reasons the towers came down yet I understand this doesn't apply to WTC 7?

Anyway, our view is that if there is more evidence of sabotage of the buildings, rather than blame the Govt, has anyone considered that the attack was more sophisticated than realised and was in fact two pronged (bombs and planes)????

__________________
PREVIOUS

2006 E53 X5 3.0D
2004 E53 X5 4.8is
2004 E53 X5 4.4 Sport
2011 E70 X5 3.0D with Aero kit
2009 E71 X6 50i Sport
2009 E70 X5 50i Sport
2007 E60 540 M Sport LCI (All time favourite car)
2007 E70 X5 4.8i Sport
2005 E53 4.8is
2003 E53 3.0 Sport

You are correct in saying that the theory of bombs in the buildings does not implicate the government. What does implicate the government is their coverup.

I personally know one of the the co-chairs of the group "9/11 Citizens Watch" which is the group run by the family members of 9/11 victims. I can tell you that these people fought over 2 years of resistance to have the 9/11 Commission created, and then they submitted a list of approximately 70 questions to the Commission as "guildines" as to what should be investigated and answered, and fewer than 10 of those questions were actually answered by the Commission's final report.

WTC #7 is not even mentioned in the 9/11 Commission Report.

And in respose to rebound, this has nothing to do with being "anti-Republican". To show that, I will respond to your statement about the Oklahoma City bombing which happened when Clinton was president and Janet Reno was Attorney General.

The official government story of the Oklahoma City bombing is that the bomb was in a truck which exploded on the street next to the building. After all, if the bomb had been planted inside the building, then the Feds would have to explain how these people got access to the inside of a high security Federal Building and were able to smuggle a large bomb inside.

With that in mind, listen to the following recording of various reports from CNN the morning of the bombing:

CNN Oklahoma City Bombing Sound Clip

Care to explain all that?

All the news channels that morning reported a simliar story. Within 24 hours, all mention of multiple bombs and stories of bomb squads defusing other bombs were purged from the news reports. But most of that entire day, this was the focus of discussion.

__________________


my experience on X5world when I spend too much
time posting in political threads in the lounge...