|
||||||||
| Xoutpost server transfer and maintenance is occurring.... |
| Xoutpost is currently undergoing a planned server migration.... stay tuned for new developments.... sincerely, the management |
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#21
|
||||
|
||||
![]() here ya go.... i even took the cover off just for you
__________________
You have your way. I have my way. As for the right way, the correct way, and the only way, it does not exist. |
| Sponsored Links | |
|
|
|
|
#22
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
|
|
#23
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
At the competition level would you stick with something production based? I'm hoping to do some HPDE this summer..did a couple autox's..really didn't enjoy them. |
|
#24
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
I only got into HPDE about three years ago, and though I did quite a lot last year, I still have a lot to learn. There's been no "master plan" for it, but I'm getting to the point where I'm considering racing next year ('08), at least to try it. We'll see how I feel at the end of this season. If I do, it'll be with one of the amateur Spec series. Spec Miata is the best known, but is also crowded. I think Spec E30 or PCA Club Racing is more likely (I'd likely use a 944, though a rear-engined 911SC sounds fun). Any of those cars run about $10-12k built, and are relatively cheap to keep running (911 excluded, on both counts). Given my skill level I don't plan on being competitive, but I think I'd like to try it. If you have the car for it then I definitely recommend HPDE, just make sure you do at least 6-8 days in your first year. I've not tracked the X5 (or any truck), but based on my experience with the S4 I think you'd be much happier with a proper sports car, or at least something under 3000lbs. It's not cheap (though it's all relative, I guess), but it's good fun, reasonably safe, and (for me at least) pretty rewarding. Good luck and be safe.
__________________
2002 X5 3.0i |
|
#25
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
The X5 is not my car to drive. I daily drive a 98 Prelude: better for HPDE than autox really. While HPDE would be much more fun, autox has a very nice level of safety. It does worry me that I can lose my car in HPDE if I do something stupid, so it would def be much more of a learning tool initially (no pushing the limits). |
|
#26
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
__________________
'08 335i Coupe - Barbera Red / Saddle Leather / Light Poplar Wood / 6spd Manual Options: Sport, Premium, Cold Weather, Comfort Access, Active Steering (awesome!), Power Rear Shade, IPod Adapter, Navigation w/IDrive Mods: M6 Wheels, Split Armrest, M-Steering Wheel, Euro Light Switch w/Rear Fog Lights, Short Shift Knob w/Matching E-Brake Handle, Clear Reflectors, CDV, Clear Bra Retired:'04 X5 4.4i |
|
#27
|
||||
|
||||
|
more HP, less high strung and can be FI'ed a lot easier. Need I say more... and this is coming from a guy who built a B18C turbo'ed, nos'ed, and Motec'ed.
Quote:
|
|
#28
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
Maybe compared to the B motors.. Even so who cares when you have power/tq everywhere with the K20 and a transmission to match the engine's characteristics. So your Ecotec is better than an F1 engine because it's less high-strung? Every K20 other than the K20A2 has a higher output than the 2ZZ. The 2ZZ is comparable to the B18c (and even still the B18c is better)..K20s are leagues ahead of both, tunability being the major factor. The only downside to the K20 right now is cost. Welcome to new tech.. Why is the 2ZZ a lot easier to fi than a B or K motor?
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
|
|
|
|