![]() |
Quote:
|
Yeah Sig makes good stuff. Is the reason you can't carry your 226 because it's too big and heavy?
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
Quote:
|
Makes sense. I carry a Glock 27 and sometimes even just a NAA mini revolver for that reason.
Between those options, the 320 is going to be considerably lighter being it has a plastic frame. A couple more options for you that will have same manual of arms that you're used to or are striker fired: Sig M11 (or P228/P229) is basically a compact version of the 226. Sig 227 (compact .45) Glock 19/23 Glock 26/27 Smith & Wesson M&P (the shield can be had for under $300 right now after a rebate). Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
summer coming up, I use a sig 938 or glock 43
both are nice for pocket carry |
Agreed, both are good pocket guns. I like the Sig 938 better than the G43 but neither is a bad choice.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
Quote:
How big of a guy are you Cleanisfast? I'm 5'7" 190 athletic build and not zombiefied about occasional printing so in the summer I would be IWB under a T-shirt - Glock 26 Gen4 right now, but I also have a Taurus 605 2" barrel revolver if I wanted to carry a wheelgun (which I'll admit isn't too often, I reach for my Glocks) - I may be adding a Glock 43 in a few months (I get a Blue Label discount from GSSF membership around end of May each year) as the single stack is just a bit easier in summer, not by much - In winter I'd have no problem with my Glock 19 Gen4, but I wouldn't go larger than that, personally - Sig P320 is great choice, I assume you mean the 15+1 Compact? The Carry has a Full Size grip length and 17+1 capacity, and the P320 is just a hair larger than a Glock 19 in the Compact configuration if you put them side by side - Great pistol though, I'd also look into the P320 Subcompact if you can find it in 9mm as its a bit bigger than a Glock 26 and is 12+1 very respectable capacity - small grip is very slim as well - Now Sig keeping magazines, different size grip frames etc in stock is a whole other thread that belongs on SigTalk..... |
5'11 - 185-190lb
Yes the Sig P320 Compact/Carry which is 15+1. Subcompact grip looks too tiny in my opinion. I've held the P320 Carry and it just feels good and something that I could carry versus my 226 which is heavier and bigger. Just not a fan of Glock, I actually have a full size Glock 17 and never use the damn thing. Sits in the case, I barely even use it at the range. Not a fan of the grip, plastic feel, potential slide bite, etc |
Quote:
17+1 with Compact slide, and Full size grip length is the "Carry" - which is a stupid name for it anyway as its not a CCW size at all IMO as the grip sticks out the most - they should rename it to "Duty", would make it easier - Not going to get into a Sig vs. Glock pissing match but is your 17 a Gen4? Lot of improvements over the Gen3 in my opinion - Pistols and guns are subjective, what feels good in the hand for one person doesn't feel good for another - But unless you have gorilla hands I wouldn't worry about slide bite, and they do provide beavertailed backstraps for your G17 Gen4 if you do :) - and that low bore axis is what makes Glock such a soft shooter - Full disclosure I am a believer in the Glock "perfection" so I may be a bit biased but I also own a P320 Compact (in 45ACP so 9+1), PPQ in 9mm, and recently purchased a VP9 so I appreciate all the different striker pistols in their own right (except for an M&P, that pistol does absolutely nothing for me) |
Quote:
Glock 17 is Gen 3 And the 320 I was looking at is the Carry size. Grip length looked smaller than the normal size one though? Grip length was in between the Full size and the sub-compact. Unless they have Full, Carry, Compact, Subcompact??? I like the idea of a .45 ACP P320 :D |
| All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:33 PM. |
vBulletin, Copyright 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.6.0
© 2017 Xoutpost.com. All rights reserved.