|
||||||||
| Xoutpost server transfer and maintenance is occurring.... |
| Xoutpost is currently undergoing a planned server migration.... stay tuned for new developments.... sincerely, the management |
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#161
|
|||
|
|||
|
Before you mention China remember that the chinese have had FTZs since the mid 80's which are run as strict capitalist societies and have turned the FTZs into the most densly populated areas in the country and also made the Buick one of the best selling cars in china. |
| Sponsored Links | |
|
|
|
|
#162
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
Last edited by the head; 01-25-2007 at 01:13 PM. |
|
#163
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
|
|
#164
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
Our government does not do it out of the goodness of their hearts. Foreign Aid in the Federal Budget is basically corporate welfare with an excuse. Our government never just gives money to other countries. There are always strings attached. 90% of the money we give is in the form of military aid. The money never even goes to these countries. Instead, the money goes from the State Department to the American military contractor, and the weapons are sent to the country. In the Federal Budget, this appears under "foreign aid", but it is nothing more than a bone for the military contractors. Likewise, 90% of the money that has been designated for "rebuilding Iraq" is more of the same. The money is simply being paid to American firms like Bechtel and Haliburton, even though there are Iraqi firms (who hire Iraqi employees) that can do the same work for less money. And even though Iraq has an unemployment rate of around 50%, Bechtel and Haliburton bring in workers from the Burma and Indonesia to do the work because they will work for less money. And the worst part about this all is that these contracts are never bargained and there is no bidding process. The State Department vastly overpays in these contracts. Because the goal here is not really to provide aid, but instead to find a way in which more of our taxpayer dollars can be given to these large corporations. And I'm sure you have read the articles over the last few years how Haliburton has been caught overcharging the government. Do you know what the penalty was? Nothing. They did not even have to return the money. The Justice Department never prosecuted anyone, and it was simply forgotton.
__________________
![]() my experience on X5world when I spend too much time posting in political threads in the lounge...
|
|
#165
|
|||
|
|||
|
while a large part of our self administered aid goes to these people moneys send through the world bank are administered for national infrastructure projects...Brazil had a loan in this manner, held by the united states that allowed them to get in more business to drive thier economy, and create the gasahol programs that have allowed them to claim oil independence 4th qtr of last year...that loan was held by the United States so a much as you like to vilify our government blanket statements are ballsy at least and ignorant at best
cheers J |
|
#166
|
|||
|
|||
|
those "LOANS" to countries like Brazil were *NOT* asked for by those countries: they were forced upon them, with impossibly high interest rates, under the guise of "helping" the countries to modernize, usually by building out electrical infrastructure, etc. What result? Those countries are forever indebted to us allowing us to install more puppet governments.
Seriously, until there is explicit evidence to DISPROVE his account, read CONFESSIONS OF AN ECONOMIC HITMAN. I don't understand why there's such an infatuation with presuming that our country -- MERELY because it is OUR country -- is doing the right things for the right reasons??
__________________
MARC/CROSVS | UCLA Bruin, B.A. Econ, Aug 2004 | J.D., Thomas Jefferson School of Law, May 2008 -- MEMBER: California State Bar, December 4, 2008 2005 BMW 645 Cabrio | Black Sapphire Metallic, Ti trim | 6AT | fully loaded sans HUD 2000 Ford Mustang V6 | laser red on tan | 5-spd | track-prepped |
|
#167
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/business/2899637.stm http://www.aceee.org/press/brazil.htm http://lnweb18.worldbank.org/Externa...7?OpenDocument I am not saying that everything is done for the right reasons merely stating that they are always done for the wrong reasons is not correct and I had to read Confessions for my international finance class great book lots of information and I by no means discount it just saying that while some of the moves made are quite unethical some things are actually done for the right reasons... |
|
#168
|
||||
|
||||
|
Amazon.com: Confessions of an Economic Hit Man
John Perkins started and stopped writing Confessions of an Economic Hit Man four times over 20 years. He says he was threatened and bribed in an effort to kill the project, but after 9/11 he finally decided to go through with this expose of his former professional life. Perkins, a former chief economist at Boston strategic-consulting firm Chas. T. Main, says he was an "economic hit man" for 10 years, helping U.S. intelligence agencies and multinationals cajole and blackmail foreign leaders into serving U.S. foreign policy and awarding lucrative contracts to American business. "Economic hit men (EHMs) are highly paid professionals who cheat countries around the globe out of trillions of dollars," Perkins writes. Confessions of an Economic Hit Man is an extraordinary and gripping tale of intrigue and dark machinations. Think John Le Carré, except it's a true story. Perkins writes that his economic projections cooked the books Enron-style to convince foreign governments to accept billions of dollars of loans from the World Bank and other institutions to build dams, airports, electric grids, and other infrastructure he knew they couldn't afford. The loans were given on condition that construction and engineering contracts went to U.S. companies. Often, the money would simply be transferred from one bank account in Washington, D.C., to another one in New York or San Francisco. The deals were smoothed over with bribes for foreign officials, but it was the taxpayers in the foreign countries who had to pay back the loans. When their governments couldn't do so, as was often the case, the U.S. or its henchmen at the World Bank or International Monetary Fund would step in and essentially place the country in trusteeship, dictating everything from its spending budget to security agreements and even its United Nations votes. It was, Perkins writes, a clever way for the U.S. to expand its "empire" at the expense of Third World citizens.
__________________
![]() my experience on X5world when I spend too much time posting in political threads in the lounge...
|
|
#169
|
|||
|
|||
|
thank you for that, eric
__________________
MARC/CROSVS | UCLA Bruin, B.A. Econ, Aug 2004 | J.D., Thomas Jefferson School of Law, May 2008 -- MEMBER: California State Bar, December 4, 2008 2005 BMW 645 Cabrio | Black Sapphire Metallic, Ti trim | 6AT | fully loaded sans HUD 2000 Ford Mustang V6 | laser red on tan | 5-spd | track-prepped |
|
#170
|
|||
|
|||
|
(p.s. funny how the usual suspects have dropped out of this discussion it seems like........)
__________________
MARC/CROSVS | UCLA Bruin, B.A. Econ, Aug 2004 | J.D., Thomas Jefferson School of Law, May 2008 -- MEMBER: California State Bar, December 4, 2008 2005 BMW 645 Cabrio | Black Sapphire Metallic, Ti trim | 6AT | fully loaded sans HUD 2000 Ford Mustang V6 | laser red on tan | 5-spd | track-prepped |
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
|
|
|
|